City mulls fireworks rules

Sparklers and cherry bombs are not the only thing residents will see around holidays this year.
R.J. Wolcott
Jun 6, 2012

New regulations recently approved by the Michigan Legislature redefines what are considered fireworks, and municipalities are now faced with the question of how to regulate the changes.

Public Act 256 took effect Jan. 1, rebranding fireworks into three separate categories: display, consumer and low-impact.

The big change from Act 256 comes from the legalization of the sale of consumer-grade fireworks in the state. Consumer fireworks include bottle rockets and firecrackers, which were previously illegal in the state.

Grand Haven City Council began the task of determining what changes, if any, are made to existing ordinances.

According to Act 256, section 7(2), “A local unit of government may enact an ordinance regulating the ignition, discharge and use of consumer fireworks. However, an ordinance enacted under this subsection shall not regulate the use of consumer fireworks on the day proceeding, the day of, or the day after a national holiday.”

The city is left with three options, according to the city's public safety department: forego any further ordinances and allow residents use fireworks freely; adopt an ordinance that would make discharging fireworks during non-holiday periods a misdemeanor of city code or a civil infraction; allow fireworks on not only national holidays, but during certain festivals and community celebrations such as the Coast Guard Festival.

Public Safety Director Jeff Hawke said the department is recommending the third option. In a memo to the city manager, Hawke said it would preserve peace and tranquility for Grand Haven residents, as well as allow people to use fireworks during holidays and special occasions.

City Council seemed split on how to handle the situation at Monday night's meeting.

Councilman Michael Fritz agreed with Hawke that residents should be allowed to use fireworks during special occasions. Fritz said not regulating the use of fireworks would allow emergency dispatchers to focus on situations that are more important.

Councilman Bob Monetza said the legislation passed by the state was "obnoxious." Monetza advocated for a continued prohibition of fireworks in Grand Haven, aside from holidays — which, he said, the city could not restrict, according to the new law.

City Manager Pat McGinnis advocated for a compromise. He said council could write an ordinance that would only allow for fireworks displays on state-regulated days, excluding the days immediately surrounding the second Saturday of the annual Coast Guard Festival.

Council is expected to make a decision later this month.
 

Comments

sirhansalot

State law is state law…… The city can only enforce the noise ordinance, which by the way law enforcement allow the city to break every night the musical fountain runs…..

ohwell

Cities have and can enforce their own laws/rules.

eimee

I agree with the regulations on these fireworks. They are dangerous and should be controlled. - Markus Lattner

freddy99

I think having rules for fireworks is definitely a must have. So much safety needs to go into. This is why these rules need to be put in place here. http://www.frinifurniture.ca/

Post a Comment

Log in to your account to post comments here and on other stories, galleries and polls. Share your thoughts and reply to comments posted by others. Don't have an account on GrandHavenTribune.com? Create a new account today to get started.