'No wake' gets second chance

There's a wave of hope for a proposed no-wake zone along the Grand River through Grand Haven and Spring Lake townships.
Alex Doty
Dec 10, 2013

 

Grand Haven Township officials were able to persuade the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to modify a planned zone, making it smaller than one rejected two months ago.

“I think it’s good,” Township Trustee Howard Behm said of the revised plan. “Hopefully, it will work out, and Spring Lake (Township) will feel the same way.”

While the Grand Haven Township Board on Monday postponed taking any action on the new zone Jan. 13, the Spring Lake Township Board voted Monday night to approve the plan.

Behm noted that it is a positive step to have support of the state agency in getting the no-wake zone back to the original specifications discussed in 2012.

The discussion started last year when several Grand Haven Township residents approached both communities with concerns about fast boats in the mostly residential stretch of water.

Unless there is a posted no-wake zone — or boats are within 100 feet of a dock or moored boat — watercraft is allowed to go 55 mph on Michigan's inland waters.

But based on the new ordinance, operators of a boat 26 feet or longer would be prohibited from operating at a speed that created a wake. The zone would be on the westernmost channel of the Grand River from Willowwood Drive south to Pottawattomie Bayou.

“The people (living there) were very pleased that this was moving forward,” Township Manager Bill Cargo said.

The zone would be marked with buoys purchased by Grand Haven Township once it becomes official in both townships.

The change in direction comes after a decision in October that saw efforts run aground.

"As you recall, Spring Lake Township decided to (vote down) a no-wake zone because they felt that the DNR stretched it too far," Cargo said.

The nixed zone went from the tip of the Indian Channel island to Pottawattomie Bayou. Some Spring Lake Township trustees took exception to the DNR's plan in October because it added about 1,100 more feet of no-wake water.

On Monday, the Spring Lake Township Board voted 6-0 to accept the DNR's shorter zone.

To read more of this story, see today’s print or e-edition of the Grand Haven Tribune.

Tribune reporter Marie Havenga contributed to this report.

Comments

WWJD

More no wake zones are totally unnecessary. If anything we should be looking at eliminating or reducing the existing no wake zones. There is absolutely no reason for the Grand River to be no wake from the Holiday Inn all the way to the big lake. Portions of that section should be no wake, but others should be opened up to allow for safe travel at a reasonable speed. And as for the section presently at issue, there is no environmental or safety reason for the push for yet another no wake zone, it is being driven simply to satisfy the limited interests of a small number of property owners along that part of the river at the expense of all the others who use the water.

TooMuch

Hey why have boats in the water at all? Shouldn't just the home owners who have property ON the water enjoy the water, make the rules, push for the rules THEY want, have access? Let's just look AT the water. In fact.. Oh this isn't about facts, sorry, I was getting out of hand!

 

Post a Comment

Log in to your account to post comments here and on other stories, galleries and polls. Share your thoughts and reply to comments posted by others. Don't have an account on GrandHavenTribune.com? Create a new account today to get started.