Should the Tri-Cities become one government?

Apr 15, 2011


You could live in any one of the local cities, villages or townships, but you really don’t envision yourself crossing borders when you go about your daily activities. When you meet people from somewhere else and they ask where you live, you probably just say “Grand Haven” — even if you live in Spring Lake, Ferrysburg, Robinson Township or any other place beyond the technical boundaries of Coast Guard City USA.

So I started thinking recently about why all these local municipal entities don’t just merge.

This idea has taken on more plausibility recently since, just to our east, a group calling themselves the “One Kent Coalition” has started talking about merging Kent County and Grand Rapids. Advocating for folding the county into what would be a much larger city are some big players, including former mayors of Grand Rapids suburbs and other community supporters. They are still debating it there, and it will be interesting to see if a merger of Kent County and Grand Rapids happens or not.

But, either way, it seems to make some sense that we talk about it here. I’m sure there would be some reasonable objections, but there also are reasons that combining municipalities makes some sense.

Among the objections would be the loss of local representation. If you live in Ferrysburg or Spring Lake, you might fear that your civic voice would be drowned out in a larger entity. However, that could be addressed by the structure of a new, merged city. Former separate cities and villages could be considered districts or wards, and a new city charter could stipulate that each district have appropriate representation on a city council.

Similarly, some would worry that one combined city would be difficult — given the variety of local ordinances, building zones and laws. But a new city council could either work to derive common laws, or allow separate zoning by district.

Taxes would be another issue, I’m sure. With a long history of different local elected officials — and different opinions of local citizens on ballot proposals — special assessment districts, millages and tax rates are different. Those could be preserved as distinct tax rates as well, until certain bonds are paid off, and eventually the new city could work out a common tax code for the newly united city.

That leads to one of the advantages.

In a merged municipal entity, services could be combined as well, which would be a case for lower taxes for all. We already have shared police service with Spring Lake and Ferrysburg. Many other services and jobs could be combined as well.

I know the people who currently hold those jobs would be understandably upset, but the taxpayers have the say on how many “employees” they need. I heard about another area of the country where there was a municipal merger and costs declined 20 percent, and the number of employees was reduced from 7,000 to 5,000. In an era of constant public budget crisis, that seems like good sense.

Years ago, when Rix Robinson was one of the first settlers to the region, there were no bridges or easy crossings of the Grand River and Spring Lake. It may have made sense then that three separate communities rose up where water clearly and dramatically separated them. But today, with bridges and modern transportation, there’s little reason for separate cities and villages.

The local Chamber of Commerce and community foundation recognize the obvious reality and serve the whole area. It’s time to at least talk about doing the same with local government.

— By Tim Penning, an associate professor of communications at Grand Valley State University. His columns and other thoughts can be read on his PierPoints blog:



This argument should prove entertaining to watch. I'm wonder how many of the right leaning conservatives start saying.. no not here, we ment for other areas to consolidate and cut the local governement...

We need data, is there a group collecting last years budgets from all the local bodies, trying to figure out who can be nixed out of a job? I'm sure we have more employee's needed to run our little towns... who's the first local public employee willing to quit for the better good of the whole?


I believe when things get to big people get lost. Grand Haven Township is big enough we do not need any more headaches to deal with. Is it really going to save money?? I doubt that highly you will still need a good amount of people to keep an eye on everything and if we undercut certain jobs things could fall apart. I am for a smaller goverenment so I guess let Ferrysburg and Spring Lake merge since you are both on the same side of the Bridge. As far as my taxes go where I live is lower than the cities taxes so leave it alone.


I would disagree that I am "home" in Spring Lake or Grand Haven. I seldom travel TO those localities. I often travel THROUGH them on the way to the places I really do business. Grand Haven and Spring Lake have totally different problems and concerns than does my little hometown of Ferrysburg. We have a balanced budget, a customer service-oriented City staff, and a responsive CIty Council whose members treat all citizens with respect. We worked hard to become the government we are today, and I, for one, do not want to see our strengths diluted by other political and governmental entities.
Yes, we can cooperate in some ventures - as we do for Police services and our Recreation system. But we need to keep government separate. Otherwise, Ferrysburg will be totally overwhelmed by surrounding, bigger entities.
There is a reason we became a chartered city back in the 60s. If we had wanted to combine with SL, GDH, or SL Township, we would have done so at that time.


there is a lot of duplication in these communities. It makes complete sense to explore sharing some services or pooling resources.


Post a Comment

Log in to your account to post comments here and on other stories, galleries and polls. Share your thoughts and reply to comments posted by others. Don't have an account on Create a new account today to get started.