Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to continue reading.
We have used your information to see if you have a subscription with us, but did not find one. Please use the button below to verify an existing account or to purchase a new subscription.
Your current subscription does not provide access to this content. Please use the button below to manage your account.
Verify your print or online subscription account here. Full week print subscribers are entitled to FREE unlimited online and eEdition access through GrandHaven Tribune All-Access.
Verify your print or online subscription account here. Full week print subscribers are entitled to FREE unlimited online and eEdition access through GrandHaven Tribune All-Access.
A stray shower or thunderstorm is possible early. Some clouds this evening will give way to mainly clear skies overnight. Low 59F. Winds ENE at 5 to 10 mph..
Tonight
A stray shower or thunderstorm is possible early. Some clouds this evening will give way to mainly clear skies overnight. Low 59F. Winds ENE at 5 to 10 mph.
I read with interest the column from my colleague, Pastor John Koedyker, on “Looking at abortion from a position of faith” (July 13). I was disappointed, however, to see that it was only his own perspective on faith on this issue that was presented.
I was disappointed, but not surprised. Because increasingly in our country, and in our own local elections, one segment of Christianity is privileging their own personal view over the views of other Christians – not to mention those from other faith traditions or those who do not choose to belong to a faith tradition. And the idea that one particular view in one particular religion should govern the law of the entire country runs counter, not only to Christian charity but also to the First Amendment to our Constitution, which insists that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”
In my opinion, it's a simple proposition. Government has no business taking away the right to women's autonomy by forcing them to give birth under all circumstances.
It should be strictly a woman's choice, not a government mandate.
I support Roe but not the constant arrogant judgment of Cramer. He could have made his case without tearing down soemeone else…but that’s what a narcissist does.
I appreciated the breadth of resources from various faith traditions that Father Cramer offered his readers. And I find it interesting how many Christians tout what they refer to as our Judeo-Christian values, but then dismiss the view of Jewish Americans on fetal life and reproductive health. Too many Christians claim their view on this issue as the "Christian" view, despite the fact that, as Fr. Cramer also points out, this is not a view shared by all adherents to the Christian faith. Reading this column allowed me to listen respectfully to the views of Americans from varying faith traditions. And I learned from it.
Totally agree with Rev. Cramer. One religion should not be the last word for women who do or don't seek abortion. If a woman does not want an abortion then don't have an abortion, but please don't think it is your right to push your beliefs on others. The SCOTUS is wrong. They have taken a right away from women. It is not the Goverment's business what a woman does with her body.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism
that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness
accounts, the history behind an article.
(4) comments
In my opinion, it's a simple proposition. Government has no business taking away the right to women's autonomy by forcing them to give birth under all circumstances.
It should be strictly a woman's choice, not a government mandate.
I support Roe but not the constant arrogant judgment of Cramer. He could have made his case without tearing down soemeone else…but that’s what a narcissist does.
I appreciated the breadth of resources from various faith traditions that Father Cramer offered his readers. And I find it interesting how many Christians tout what they refer to as our Judeo-Christian values, but then dismiss the view of Jewish Americans on fetal life and reproductive health. Too many Christians claim their view on this issue as the "Christian" view, despite the fact that, as Fr. Cramer also points out, this is not a view shared by all adherents to the Christian faith. Reading this column allowed me to listen respectfully to the views of Americans from varying faith traditions. And I learned from it.
Totally agree with Rev. Cramer. One religion should not be the last word for women who do or don't seek abortion. If a woman does not want an abortion then don't have an abortion, but please don't think it is your right to push your beliefs on others. The SCOTUS is wrong. They have taken a right away from women. It is not the Goverment's business what a woman does with her body.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.