The leaders of the Republican Caucus in the Michigan House of Representatives want to pull public notices from newspapers and allow governmental entities (cities, villages, townships, counties, etc.) to satisfy notice requirements by putting them on their websites. This is an unprecedented blow to governmental transparency and due process.

A version of this legislation has been introduced in each legislative session for the past 12 years and has failed. Why? Because then, as now, it is a bad idea.

From the very start, Michigan law has required that notices of governmental actions be provided to citizens by publication in newspapers, an independent source of information about the actions of government. Now, legislators are proposing to end this important check on governmental power.

The Michigan Press Association has been told that this issue is in the top five priorities of the speaker of the House. With crumbling roads, failing schools and escalating health care costs, we fail to see government control over messaging as being on any citizen’s list of priorities.

The legislators in support of this movement say that this will save money – but how? Is this the one exception to the Republican Party’s embrace of privatization? It defies logic that government can do this better and cheaper than newspapers, who have provided this valuable check and balance for more than 150 years.

A quick glance at some local government websites doesn’t give one comfort that things will be done well under this new scheme. A couple of shining examples: One township website lists among its elected officials a congressman who has been deceased for several years. Another has not updated meeting agendas since 2014.

We have long advocated that these notices belong in newspapers and protect due process in Michigan. We do, however, acknowledge that they also need to be distributed digitally and are working hard with our members to make sure that they are accessible on a computer, mobile device and in print. This increases transparency and protects your right to know what government officials are doing with your taxpayer dollars.

Citizens of this state have been the victims of Equifax, Capitol One, Department of Veterans Affairs and many other online entities as their personal online information has been compromised. The information you trust local leaders to provide to you regarding your taxes, property and other important issues in your community shouldn’t be made vulnerable to a similar fate.

Even if the lack of security is not considered, the lack of connectivity should be. Michigan ranks 30th in the nation for broadband connectivity. Rural areas still pose a challenge for those trying to use the internet. Public notices belong in a public place, like a local newspaper, not on a government website, which can also disenfranchise certain users, like low-income individuals who do not have access to the internet, or the elderly who are not comfortable using the internet. Having to look for notices on each individual government site would be laborious at best and a good way to conceal information at worst.

We at Michigan newspapers take the responsibility of keeping you informed very seriously. Whether it be making sure Freedom of Information and Open Meetings laws are being followed or proper notice of things like zoning that might put a landfill in your neighborhood is happening. We remain the vital watchdogs we always have been in our communities.

If knowing that an independent, reliable source is watching what elected officials are doing with your taxpayer dollars is important to you, please consider contacting your state representative and senator and letting them know you want to keep seeing your public notices where you notice – in a newspaper.

About the writer: Dirk Milliman is the Public Policy Committee chairman of the Michigan Press Association.

(4) comments


Wow! Has it always been the Republican Party has supported this legislation? Cutting the people’s right to know is always wrong. Not only the availability of internet limits people knowing this important information, but there is a large Group over 50 who do not access the Internet.


Surprise! Michigan Newspaper Association opposes legislation that would end lining their pockets with tax dollars – talk about a conflict of interest!

Maybe it would enhance our right to know if warnings about severe weather by government entities were required to give notice through snail mail and land lines. And bringing up the over-used potential victims of the elderly and poor is laughable – used to oppose everything from Voter I.D. to changes in Social Security and Medicaid – like the elderly are going to dive to the back of their 8 page local paper to look through the tiny print to get a notice about some meaningless action by their city council – and the ‘poor’ weren’t gifted with Obamaphones to get them connected. Notwithstanding that, the Pew Research Organization found that only 2% of those 18-29 get their news from papers; 8% of those 30-49; 18% of those 50-64; and 39% of those 65 or older. Maybe legislation should require that taxpayer funded notices have to be printed in a minimum font of 12, and to retain their subsidy, papers have to be provided to the poor for free – like Obamacare.

It irks many of us that newspapers are failing in part because most of them are biased toward left-wing causes but they are subsidized by out tax dollars, while more people get their news from news websites than newspapers.

Here’s a wild thought – maybe newspapers could start ‘reporting’ – taking notices from the internet and incorporating them as part of their news!

Annabella Bush

You need to get over your “left wing” conspiracy theories. Change the channel. There is a whole world out there besides Hannity.


Well dear, I’m pleased that you apparently agreed with my arguments about taxpayers being forced to subsidize print media and the foolishness of that coercive legislation.

You don’t know me so you have to take my assertion that I make my own decisions on issues based on my experience and my education – the only connection I have with Hannity is growing up on Long Island and a construction and bartending background.

As far as my “leftwing’ reference, if you’re at all curious you should search for the now defunct Democrat group ‘Crowdpac” that studied bias of professions by political donations – the print media overwhelmingly donated to Democrats.

Give research a try, and consider the bias of the ‘Community Columnists” your local paper highlights

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.